Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think
people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give
your own opinion
It is stated that hazardous sports should be prohibited. However, numerous arguments have been made in aid of the idea that citizens ought to participate in any sports they are interested in. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who advocate the ban cite that it is governments’ responsibility to forbid perilous sports for several reasons. Firstly, when those engaging in extreme sports make any mistake, they can be seriously injured or even killed. More specifically, boxing, skiing or mountaineering could give rise to hundreds of physical disabilities from grave injuries or even deaths to athletes.
Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines
to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better
way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The methods of mitigating traffic congestion have been a heated topic of controversy. Some people argue that the construction of larger roads is the answer for the problem. However, I contend that such a solution is ineffective in the long term, while the option to construct railways and subways is a far better measure.
There is a common fallacy that governmental spending on building larger roads could sustainably address the problem of traffic congestion. An increase in road size could reduce the traffic intensity in the short term, but larger roads also mean that the citizens are encouraged to purchase more individual vehicles. This leads to the fact that the roads, albeit larger, would soon be filled with intense traffic again.
The government and individuals are spending too much money on national celebrations like new year or festivals. Do you agree or disagree? People have different views on whether public expenditure on national occasions such as new year or festivals is too much nowadays. While I agree that governments and individuals are spending a significant amount …
Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should make
efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems. To what extent do
you agree or disagree with this statement?
The prevention of illness and disease is a challenging problem for any community. Although many people may be sceptical about the effectiveness of an investment in improving the environment and providing more housing for the public, I believe that it is a good solution to the issue, as will now be discussed.
On the one hand, ameliorating environmental contamination can hinder the spread of disease and illness. Today, people’s health is deteriorating due to the adverse effects of poor air quality, making us more vulnerable to viruses and health problems.